As you already know from our blog post in May, Outpost Security Suite 7.1 received 3 Gold Awards for its high-speed performance in the Anti-Malware.ru's testing.
One of the performance diagrams in the Anti-Malware's report was not correctly generated though the results were correct. According to the modified diagram, Outpost is one of the leading antivirus products in the cache usage test – only Eset Nod32 is ahead; in the memory usage test Outpost shows similar results as popular solutions delivered by AVG, Avira, Comodo, PC Tools, ZoneAlarm.
As Anti-Malware.ru portal mentions, "Considering results for cache and memory usage tests, the best antivirus products are Eset, F-Secure, Outpost and Kaspersky – overall up to 300Mb".
We are glad to confirm that our product is at the top.
Best regards,
Natalia Solovyeva
Agnitum
One of the performance diagrams in the Anti-Malware's report was not correctly generated though the results were correct. According to the modified diagram, Outpost is one of the leading antivirus products in the cache usage test – only Eset Nod32 is ahead; in the memory usage test Outpost shows similar results as popular solutions delivered by AVG, Avira, Comodo, PC Tools, ZoneAlarm.
As Anti-Malware.ru portal mentions, "Considering results for cache and memory usage tests, the best antivirus products are Eset, F-Secure, Outpost and Kaspersky – overall up to 300Mb".
We are glad to confirm that our product is at the top.
Best regards,
Natalia Solovyeva
Agnitum
15 comments:
Will Agnitum participate with it's improved Antivirus program on some of the specialized AV testing sites to determine parameters like detection rate, false positives and so on, so we (end users) can see where does your AV stands against other AV products? Thanks
Zack, Agnitum already participates in independent VB100 testing:
1) Main VB100 certification on the WildList and additional collections,
2) Additional Reactive & Proactive testing - Agnitum Suite's score which is 88 % - 89 % in latest 2 tests (XP and WinServer 2008 R2).
Regarding AV-Test.org and AV-Comparatives.org, if you mean them, it depends on these labs willing to test our products.
So, currently we do not plan to certify our products for in other commercial AV labs.
7.5.1 or 7.6 - fixed bogs or crashes or add new features.coming?
quick heal firewall used agnitum outpost firewalls.but quick heal icons and colors is beter as outpost firewall.
violet color for icon is not good.
Improving icon's color scheme was not our major goal during this release, but thank you for your feedback!
By the way, QuickHeal's suite is not released now with Outpost firewall inside, so migrate to our Suite!
Most of top-rated known problems will be fixed soon, in minor release.
But we re-scheduled this minor release version to collect more information and provide well-tested edition to those who experience some issues with 7.5 version.
Congrats on 7.5! It was nice to be apart of the bata program and witness the program's development from a very dedicated Agnitum team. I signed on for two years. Cheers!
oss free when will available for sownload?
Can we see Outpost at 100% in anti-malware-test.com tests? Have you come up with all the fixing in which you failed last time with 7.1?
Also, I use Quick Heal as my AV just wondering if it use your firewall in its current suite or not? As they are mentioning it in their website. I want to use your firewall no other
Thanks
No one test lab can proof 100% detection or even self-defense for ANY product. But regarding anti-malware-test.com tests, we have dramatically improved both rates.
Regarding QuickHeal's products for Personal use, we are not sure they still use our firewall module.
But for Corporate edition Quick Heal Firewall Pro is still "Powered by Outpost Firewall".
mateousec tests?
new oss is capable for take 100% protection in side comodo products?
Sorry to bother you again but they don't have any Quick Heal Firewall Pro in their 2011 version Business Suite. I just noticed that they have removed agnitum from their technology partner list.
Sorry actually I was talking about http://www.matousec.com/
You said that no one can achieve 100% in any test, how did COMODO managed it?
I believe if someone else can do it I can also do it. This website provide source code of the tests which you can easily analyse and rectify where you were lacking.. Am i wrong?
Regards
The only thing that may lead COMODO to their top score with ho faults is that they do not manage to filter precisely web pages content, as Outpost does.
Regarding this feature (so-called "Content filtering"), it may cause some unclear issues for standard tests with so-called "not perfect" results.
And... You prefer to use the product perfect in real systems security, but not the product just being perfect in imaginary test-drives?
I fail to understand that if Quick Heal people has removed agnitum from their partners list then why agnitum is still listing Quick Heal ( formally known as CAT computers Services) in your partners lists? Perhaps to miss guide customer I don't think so
We do not think that our previous partnerships should not be listed on Agnitum.com
Post a Comment